Gestapo Chief Rudolph Diels: “The infliction of physical punishment is not every man’s job, and naturally we were only too glad to recruit men who were prepared to show no squeamishness at their task. Unfortunately, we knew nothing about the Freudian side of the business, and it was only after a number of instances of unnecessary flogging and meaningless cruelty that I tumbled to the fact that my organization had been attracting all the sadists in Germany and Austria without my knowledge for some time past. It had also been attracting unconscious sadists, i.e. men who did not know themselves that they had sadist leanings until they took part in a flogging. And finally it had been actually creating sadists. For it seems that corporal chastisement ultimately arouses sadistic leanings in apparently normal men and women. Freud might explain it.” In the Garden of Beasts, Erik Larson, 2011.
For Boethius, the 400 AD Roman philosopher, evil is US – we all have capacity for evil, and therefore to combat evil we must look to ourselves and cultivate our goodness. Evil is the absence of good. “We must break the ‘cycle of violence‘. This is the modern view, the enlightenment view, the christian view.
That evil is OTHER, that there is a distinct dualism of good and evil, this is the premodern view, the Manichaean view, the view of Mani, the early 250 A.D. Persian mystic whose ideas rivaled and threatened Roman paganism, and then christianity. Evil is a force to be opposed, to be conquered.
In Science of Evil, psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen finds that evil is a disorder of empathy. We all vary in our ’empathy quotient’. There are those with the ‘continuous, unstoppable drive to empathize‘, and those with lesser empathy. There are components of empathy – recognition and response, feeling and understanding, action and inaction. Failure to act is as significant as not feeling. There is transient empathy erosion, from fatigue, or drugs and alcohol, or depression. There is Groupthink evil, empathy that is over-powered by enthusiasm and solidarity. Nazi gatherings were organized pageants of celebration.
Lack of empathy can be a failure to be good, but it also can be something else. There are those with no empathy. . . at all, zero empathy. For them, lack of empathy is . . . .enjoyment. Serial killers relish their deceit and the knowing terror in their victim’s eyes. Stalin’s greatest joy was to go to sleep knowing that his plans for revenge were unfolding. Nazi evil was beyond efficiency. The Nazi’s precisely engineered emotional as well as physical suffering, over and above the murdering. They practiced this with a sickening aesthetic, an almost artistic intensity.
Empathy by definition is seeing one’s self in others. Those with strong empathy just aren’t likely to perceive, aren’t likely to “empathize” – with the lack of empathy others may have. This asymmetry of awareness empowers those with no empathy to use charm, and to thrive, and the rest is human history.
In Explaining Hitler, 1998, Ron Rosenbaum, in his survey of theories of Hitler, found every reason considered but that Hitler wanted to be evil and do evil things.
Pain really does hurt, but what is it that hurts? In consciousness, the subjective and objective are mysteriously unified. I am unmistakably corporeal, and yet also, unmistakably, immaterial. I have diverse sensations and thoughts, yet I am unitary. I unconsciously act and feel, and yet have agency and free will. I daydream and sleep, and yet have continuity. I am both me and I refer to ‘me’. I am self-disclosing.
Our experience of consciousness is outside of normal mental categorization. We experience ourselves as ineffable.
“No currently available concept of induction is applicable to it.” Thomas Nagel, philosopher.
“We are the singular of which the plural is unknown.” Erwin Schroedinger, physicist.
“I AM THAT I AM”. God, to Moses at the burning bush.
“Most experiences are made sense of in relation to other types of experience. . . Any experience immune to all this will be a mystery to its subject. There is only one experience for which that is completely true: phenomenal consciousness.” Natika Newton, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2001.
“What we can’t say, we can’t say, and we can’t whistle it either“. A. S. Ramsey, philosopher.
In Soul Dust, for psychologist Nicolas Humphrey consciousness is a sensation. Whatever sensation is, consciousness is. A reaction to stimuli is always an action. No sentience, no brain phenomenon is passive. All mentation is behavior. Responses to the outer world get internally registered, and they become representations. These representations then also become aspects of our further experience. Conscious beings become dual processors, they process outer world experience simultaneously with inner world representations of current and past outer world experience. An ever expanding loop of internal and external responses, and responses to responses, reverberates into a self-sustaining loop of memory, thinking, and feeling. . . and this is what we call CONSCIOUSNESS.
“Because our present experience includes at least two distinct times, it is experienced not as an instantaneous slice of time, but as a extended time, containing elements of both ‘now’ and ‘not now’, in a unified, immediate representation.”
This thickened time of consciousness, this cinema of consciousness, creates an artificially robust illusion of willful power and sense of the future. It enables us to imagine possible futures, design behavior strategies, plan and seek goals. This inner theatre gives us a sense of creative agency that drives us to endure.
But it is an illusion. We are all drinking the koolaid.
And there is a cost, for with our inner extended time, we can sense that we aren’t significant, we can know that we are going to die. We can try to find meaning, we can try to escape. We are seek intoxicated, altered states. These can be enlightening, they can illuminate the distortions of our normal consciousness, but they can also deepen our confusion, and worsen our dread. Many of us can’t manage consciousness, despair is not uncommon, suicide is not rare.
With our consciousness we transform the earth, with ever-increasing risk and reward, the genie out of the bottle.
In the early 1960’s, gun running was a profitable business. From Miami to Mexico, this involved organized crime, latin-american revolutionaries, a man in Dallas named Jack Ruby, and a New Orleans man named Lee Harvey Oswald.
In records released in 1989 by the Dallas police department, Mary Le Fontaine, a local reporter, discovered that a man had been jailed next to Oswald on November 22, 1963. He was picked up in a sweep following the shootings, was released after Oswald was murdered, and then disappeared. In 1964, he surfaced at an FBI office in Tennesee to give “information about the murder of JFK”. He told that while jailed near Oswald, he witnessed the police bring before Oswald a badly injured man and ask Oswald if this was the man he had seen at a recent motel meeting. At this meeting, money had changed hands, and one Jack Ruby also present. Oswald said ‘yes’.
After arrest, a note was found in Oswald’s personal notebook:
Oct Nov 1,1963
FBI agent (R1-11211)
James P. Hosty
MU 8605
1114 commerce St
Note the license number. Oswald was meeting Dallas FBI agent Hosty in his car, in the months preceding the assassination. Hosty was in charge of militant extremist groups, gun running, and domestic counterintelligence.
Following meetings with Hosty, Oswald took significant actions, like in March 1963, when he opened a post office box, and promptly bought, via mail order, the famous Mannlicher-Carcano rifle from Klein’s Sporting Goods. At that very time, the mail order gun business – and specifically Klein’s Sporting Goods – was under investigation by Congress. Hearings were about to begin.
Oswald spent the 1963 summer in New Orleans, working with anti-Castro groups, but also publicly posing as pro-Castro. He was exposed – on TV – as a visitor to the Soviet Union who had renounced his US Citizenship. This served to help discredit the Castro cause. Oswald seems willing to have helped this happen. Around this time, the FBI successfully raided and confiscated an anti-Castro weapons cache at Pontchartrain.
Early in November, Oswald visited the Dallas FBI office, but Hosty was not there. Oswald left a note. After the assassination, FBI headquarters in Washington ordered this note destroyed. A few days later, in Dallas, a gun deal was foiled by agents. A man was badly injured in a getaway car – the man brought before Oswald in his cell?
A sincere Marxist, but an FBI informant? With his tenuous status, trying to find and keep a job, Oswald may have been willing to help the FBI, and infiltrate anti-Castro groups. He did by all accounts believe in Castro. He may have discovered an assassination plot. He may have warned the FBI.
After the motorcade passed, he calmly left the Texas School Book Depository. He may only then have learned that the assassination had not been thwarted. He went home and got his gun.
He may have known that decoy policemen would be involved. He killed the first policeman that tried to stop him, unconcerned about eye witnesses. He may have thought he would be safe in custody.
“I want to know how God created this world. I’m not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know his thoughts, the rest are details.” Albert Einstein.
An overwhelming intuition for Einstein was that there is an all-encompassing, intelligible, something, ‘out there’, some unified and unchanging reality behind the ever-changing particulars of everyday experience. This is what he was after, what he called the secrets of the “Old One“.
For Einstein the clues were to be found in the phenomena that are invariant, phenomena that are the same, regardless of manner of measurement, or relative position, or dynamic operation, or observer point of view. He saw this in the speed of light, which was found to be the same to all observers, regardless of their own motion. With this, space and time are relative, but space-time is not. Einstein’s own great insight was that acceleration, inertia, and gravity are equivalent, and therefore, rather than a ‘force’ between two masses, gravity is inherent in all of mass and motion. It is invariant, and so must be related to space-time, and so he derives his theory of general relativity:
Ruv– 1/2 guvR = 8πTuv
“Matter tells space-time how to curve, and curved space-time tells matter how to move.” – John Wheeler. “an entwined dance of space, time, matter, and energy” – Brian Greene. Einstein, Walter Isaacson, 2008
It is really a theory of what isn’t relative. Einstein preferred that it be called the theoryofinvariants.
It turns out there is a brilliant mathematics of invariants. It is called group theory. It was invented by Evariste Galois, in France, in 1730. He was refused admission to the elite Ecole Polytechnique institute of mathematics, too advanced for their examiners to understand. He died in a duel, at age . . . . 20 .
Galois wrote his theory on a mere sixty pages of personal notes, and in a famous letter to August Chevalier just prior to his duel.
“My dear friend, In the theory of equations, I have investigated under which conditions the equations are solvable by a formula: this has given me the opportunity to make this theory more profound, and to describe all the transformations possible on an equation even when it is not solvable by formula.” The Equation that Couldn’t be Solved, Mario Livio, 2005
This theory is the mathematics of permutations and symmetries, which are patterns of geometry and number that remain unchanged during some defined operation. They are the invariants that mark the hidden unity and relations in disparate sets of phenomena. Imagine an unknown, multifaceted geometric object, unified, and complex, and dynamically changing. Imagine its sides and corners are ink soaked. Next, imagine this object tumbling across a white sheet of paper. The ink will create obscure and puzzling markings. Group theory mathematics, when applied to these markings, will yield the clues to the configuration and dynamics of this mysterious object.
This theory may well be the most profound in all of mathematics.
Einstein stood on the shoulders of giants, . . . and on those of a 20 year old genius.
https://thinkagainonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ThinkAgain-nsq.jpg00Think Againhttps://thinkagainonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/ThinkAgain-nsq.jpgThink Again2011-04-18 19:28:472011-04-18 19:28:47Mathematics Story
A person who finds that he is just never wrong would perhaps now and then be perplexed. Steve Jobs would be such a person.
“We think that computers are the most remarkable tools that humankind has ever come up with, and we think that people are basically tool users. So if we can just get lots of computers to lots of people, it will make some qualitative difference in the world. What we want to do at Apple is make computers into applicances and get them to millions of people.” Playboy Interview, February 1985.
While the MBA’s came into Apple to focus on countering IBM, he went off to create the Macintosh. It was an astounding success. But never mind, Mr. Jobs is a difficult perfectionist and doesn’t know how to manage for profit.
“Eventually Dr. [Edwin] Land [founder of Polaroid], one of those brilliant troublemakers, was asked to leave his own company – which is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard of. ” Jobs, 1985 . . .and then . . .Apple lets him go.
Apple’s ten year lead gets ‘managed’ away.
Jobs buys Pixar. He makes Toy Story. Apple nearly dies. Apple invites him back, as a ‘consultant’. He brings Next, his from-the-ground-up, unix-based, virus- proof (still) computer software operating system. After the board turns over – he will not be bit by the same dog twice – Jobs becomes CEO. Never again will he assume he doesn’t know how to manage, and never again will there be naivete’ about the intentions or actions of competitors. He moves quickly to focus Apple, totally, on quality products and the user experience. Philanthropy is dropped, middle management is cleared, HR is minimized, finance is made secondary, general management is eliminated (managers at Apple are always managers of something), responsibility is clearly defined, (every role has a DRI – directly responsible individual), decisions radiate to and from the top, profit and loss categories are discarded, market research is eliminated.
Attractive products start to sell.
But . . . Disney will bury Pixar! Sony or Microsoft will crush the iPod! Walmart or Amazon will dwarf iTunes! Nokia and the Blackberry will outdo the iPhone! Expensive laptops won’t compete with Dell! Apple stores can’t compete with Best Buy! Adobe flash is a must! Google Android will beat iOS!
“The petrochemical revolution gave us free energy – free mechanical energy. . .It changed the texture of society. . . this revolution, the information revolution, is a revolution of free energy as well, but of another kind: free intellectual energy. . . This revolution will dwarf the petrochemical revolution”. Jobs, 1985
Apple, Inc. is about to overtake Exxon Mobil as the largest valued corporation in the United States. And on Friday, July 29, 2011, Apple, Inc. had more cash than the United States Treasury.
How has an adopted son of a machinist, who dropped out of college after one year, who never took formal management, or economic, or engineering training, who follows few of the standard or advanced notions of modern corporate management, . . . how has he come to set the standard for leadership of large complex organizations,. . . how has he become the greatest CEO in history?
Zero Empathy
/in All, Books, IdeasGestapo Chief Rudolph Diels: “The infliction of physical punishment is not every man’s job, and naturally we were only too glad to recruit men who were prepared to show no squeamishness at their task. Unfortunately, we knew nothing about the Freudian side of the business, and it was only after a number of instances of unnecessary flogging and meaningless cruelty that I tumbled to the fact that my organization had been attracting all the sadists in Germany and Austria without my knowledge for some time past. It had also been attracting unconscious sadists, i.e. men who did not know themselves that they had sadist leanings until they took part in a flogging. And finally it had been actually creating sadists. For it seems that corporal chastisement ultimately arouses sadistic leanings in apparently normal men and women. Freud might explain it.” In the Garden of Beasts, Erik Larson, 2011.
For Boethius, the 400 AD Roman philosopher, evil is US – we all have capacity for evil, and therefore to combat evil we must look to ourselves and cultivate our goodness. Evil is the absence of good. “We must break the ‘cycle of violence‘. This is the modern view, the enlightenment view, the christian view.
That evil is OTHER, that there is a distinct dualism of good and evil, this is the premodern view, the Manichaean view, the view of Mani, the early 250 A.D. Persian mystic whose ideas rivaled and threatened Roman paganism, and then christianity. Evil is a force to be opposed, to be conquered.
In Science of Evil, psychologist Simon Baron-Cohen finds that evil is a disorder of empathy. We all vary in our ’empathy quotient’. There are those with the ‘continuous, unstoppable drive to empathize‘, and those with lesser empathy. There are components of empathy – recognition and response, feeling and understanding, action and inaction. Failure to act is as significant as not feeling. There is transient empathy erosion, from fatigue, or drugs and alcohol, or depression. There is Groupthink evil, empathy that is over-powered by enthusiasm and solidarity. Nazi gatherings were organized pageants of celebration.
Lack of empathy can be a failure to be good, but it also can be something else. There are those with no empathy. . . at all, zero empathy. For them, lack of empathy is . . . .enjoyment. Serial killers relish their deceit and the knowing terror in their victim’s eyes. Stalin’s greatest joy was to go to sleep knowing that his plans for revenge were unfolding. Nazi evil was beyond efficiency. The Nazi’s precisely engineered emotional as well as physical suffering, over and above the murdering. They practiced this with a sickening aesthetic, an almost artistic intensity.
Empathy by definition is seeing one’s self in others. Those with strong empathy just aren’t likely to perceive, aren’t likely to “empathize” – with the lack of empathy others may have. This asymmetry of awareness empowers those with no empathy to use charm, and to thrive, and the rest is human history.
In Explaining Hitler, 1998, Ron Rosenbaum, in his survey of theories of Hitler, found every reason considered but that Hitler wanted to be evil and do evil things.
“Man is Wolf to Man.”
Koolaid Consciousness
/in All, Books, IdeasPain really does hurt, but what is it that hurts? In consciousness, the subjective and objective are mysteriously unified. I am unmistakably corporeal, and yet also, unmistakably, immaterial. I have diverse sensations and thoughts, yet I am unitary. I unconsciously act and feel, and yet have agency and free will. I daydream and sleep, and yet have continuity. I am both me and I refer to ‘me’. I am self-disclosing.
Our experience of consciousness is outside of normal mental categorization. We experience ourselves as ineffable.
“No currently available concept of induction is applicable to it.” Thomas Nagel, philosopher.
“We are the singular of which the plural is unknown.” Erwin Schroedinger, physicist.
“I AM THAT I AM”. God, to Moses at the burning bush.
“Most experiences are made sense of in relation to other types of experience. . . Any experience immune to all this will be a mystery to its subject. There is only one experience for which that is completely true: phenomenal consciousness.” Natika Newton, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2001.
“What we can’t say, we can’t say, and we can’t whistle it either“. A. S. Ramsey, philosopher.
In Soul Dust, for psychologist Nicolas Humphrey consciousness is a sensation. Whatever sensation is, consciousness is. A reaction to stimuli is always an action. No sentience, no brain phenomenon is passive. All mentation is behavior. Responses to the outer world get internally registered, and they become representations. These representations then also become aspects of our further experience. Conscious beings become dual processors, they process outer world experience simultaneously with inner world representations of current and past outer world experience. An ever expanding loop of internal and external responses, and responses to responses, reverberates into a self-sustaining loop of memory, thinking, and feeling. . . and this is what we call CONSCIOUSNESS.
“Because our present experience includes at least two distinct times, it is experienced not as an instantaneous slice of time, but as a extended time, containing elements of both ‘now’ and ‘not now’, in a unified, immediate representation.”
This thickened time of consciousness, this cinema of consciousness, creates an artificially robust illusion of willful power and sense of the future. It enables us to imagine possible futures, design behavior strategies, plan and seek goals. This inner theatre gives us a sense of creative agency that drives us to endure.
But it is an illusion. We are all drinking the koolaid.
And there is a cost, for with our inner extended time, we can sense that we aren’t significant, we can know that we are going to die. We can try to find meaning, we can try to escape. We are seek intoxicated, altered states. These can be enlightening, they can illuminate the distortions of our normal consciousness, but they can also deepen our confusion, and worsen our dread. Many of us can’t manage consciousness, despair is not uncommon, suicide is not rare.
With our consciousness we transform the earth, with ever-increasing risk and reward, the genie out of the bottle.
Patsy
/in All, PoliticsIn the early 1960’s, gun running was a profitable business. From Miami to Mexico, this involved organized crime, latin-american revolutionaries, a man in Dallas named Jack Ruby, and a New Orleans man named Lee Harvey Oswald.
In records released in 1989 by the Dallas police department, Mary Le Fontaine, a local reporter, discovered that a man had been jailed next to Oswald on November 22, 1963. He was picked up in a sweep following the shootings, was released after Oswald was murdered, and then disappeared. In 1964, he surfaced at an FBI office in Tennesee to give “information about the murder of JFK”. He told that while jailed near Oswald, he witnessed the police bring before Oswald a badly injured man and ask Oswald if this was the man he had seen at a recent motel meeting. At this meeting, money had changed hands, and one Jack Ruby also present. Oswald said ‘yes’.
After arrest, a note was found in Oswald’s personal notebook:
OctNov 1,1963FBI agent (R1-11211)
James P. Hosty
MU 8605
1114 commerce St
Note the license number. Oswald was meeting Dallas FBI agent Hosty in his car, in the months preceding the assassination. Hosty was in charge of militant extremist groups, gun running, and domestic counterintelligence.
Following meetings with Hosty, Oswald took significant actions, like in March 1963, when he opened a post office box, and promptly bought, via mail order, the famous Mannlicher-Carcano rifle from Klein’s Sporting Goods. At that very time, the mail order gun business – and specifically Klein’s Sporting Goods – was under investigation by Congress. Hearings were about to begin.
Oswald spent the 1963 summer in New Orleans, working with anti-Castro groups, but also publicly posing as pro-Castro. He was exposed – on TV – as a visitor to the Soviet Union who had renounced his US Citizenship. This served to help discredit the Castro cause. Oswald seems willing to have helped this happen. Around this time, the FBI successfully raided and confiscated an anti-Castro weapons cache at Pontchartrain.
Early in November, Oswald visited the Dallas FBI office, but Hosty was not there. Oswald left a note. After the assassination, FBI headquarters in Washington ordered this note destroyed. A few days later, in Dallas, a gun deal was foiled by agents. A man was badly injured in a getaway car – the man brought before Oswald in his cell?
A sincere Marxist, but an FBI informant? With his tenuous status, trying to find and keep a job, Oswald may have been willing to help the FBI, and infiltrate anti-Castro groups. He did by all accounts believe in Castro. He may have discovered an assassination plot. He may have warned the FBI.
After the motorcade passed, he calmly left the Texas School Book Depository. He may only then have learned that the assassination had not been thwarted. He went home and got his gun.
He may have known that decoy policemen would be involved. He killed the first policeman that tried to stop him, unconcerned about eye witnesses. He may have thought he would be safe in custody.
“I’m a patsy.“
Mathematics Story
/in All, Books, Ideas“I want to know how God created this world. I’m not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know his thoughts, the rest are details.” Albert Einstein.
An overwhelming intuition for Einstein was that there is an all-encompassing, intelligible, something, ‘out there’, some unified and unchanging reality behind the ever-changing particulars of everyday experience. This is what he was after, what he called the secrets of the “Old One“.
For Einstein the clues were to be found in the phenomena that are invariant, phenomena that are the same, regardless of manner of measurement, or relative position, or dynamic operation, or observer point of view. He saw this in the speed of light, which was found to be the same to all observers, regardless of their own motion. With this, space and time are relative, but space-time is not. Einstein’s own great insight was that acceleration, inertia, and gravity are equivalent, and therefore, rather than a ‘force’ between two masses, gravity is inherent in all of mass and motion. It is invariant, and so must be related to space-time, and so he derives his theory of general relativity:
Ruv– 1/2 guvR = 8πTuv
“Matter tells space-time how to curve, and curved space-time tells matter how to move.” – John Wheeler. “an entwined dance of space, time, matter, and energy” – Brian Greene. Einstein, Walter Isaacson, 2008
It is really a theory of what isn’t relative. Einstein preferred that it be called the theory of invariants.
It turns out there is a brilliant mathematics of invariants. It is called group theory. It was invented by Evariste Galois, in France, in 1730. He was refused admission to the elite Ecole Polytechnique institute of mathematics, too advanced for their examiners to understand. He died in a duel, at age . . . . 20 .
Galois wrote his theory on a mere sixty pages of personal notes, and in a famous letter to August Chevalier just prior to his duel.
“My dear friend, In the theory of equations, I have investigated under which conditions the equations are solvable by a formula: this has given me the opportunity to make this theory more profound, and to describe all the transformations possible on an equation even when it is not solvable by formula.” The Equation that Couldn’t be Solved, Mario Livio, 2005
This theory is the mathematics of permutations and symmetries, which are patterns of geometry and number that remain unchanged during some defined operation. They are the invariants that mark the hidden unity and relations in disparate sets of phenomena. Imagine an unknown, multifaceted geometric object, unified, and complex, and dynamically changing. Imagine its sides and corners are ink soaked. Next, imagine this object tumbling across a white sheet of paper. The ink will create obscure and puzzling markings. Group theory mathematics, when applied to these markings, will yield the clues to the configuration and dynamics of this mysterious object.
This theory may well be the most profound in all of mathematics.
Einstein stood on the shoulders of giants, . . . and on those of a 20 year old genius.
iGenius
/in All, Ideas, PoliticsA person who finds that he is just never wrong would perhaps now and then be perplexed. Steve Jobs would be such a person.
“We think that computers are the most remarkable tools that humankind has ever come up with, and we think that people are basically tool users. So if we can just get lots of computers to lots of people, it will make some qualitative difference in the world. What we want to do at Apple is make computers into applicances and get them to millions of people.” Playboy Interview, February 1985.
While the MBA’s came into Apple to focus on countering IBM, he went off to create the Macintosh. It was an astounding success. But never mind, Mr. Jobs is a difficult perfectionist and doesn’t know how to manage for profit.
“Eventually Dr. [Edwin] Land [founder of Polaroid], one of those brilliant troublemakers, was asked to leave his own company – which is one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard of. ” Jobs, 1985 . . .and then . . .Apple lets him go.
Apple’s ten year lead gets ‘managed’ away.
Jobs buys Pixar. He makes Toy Story. Apple nearly dies. Apple invites him back, as a ‘consultant’. He brings Next, his from-the-ground-up, unix-based, virus- proof (still) computer software operating system. After the board turns over – he will not be bit by the same dog twice – Jobs becomes CEO. Never again will he assume he doesn’t know how to manage, and never again will there be naivete’ about the intentions or actions of competitors. He moves quickly to focus Apple, totally, on quality products and the user experience. Philanthropy is dropped, middle management is cleared, HR is minimized, finance is made secondary, general management is eliminated (managers at Apple are always managers of something), responsibility is clearly defined, (every role has a DRI – directly responsible individual), decisions radiate to and from the top, profit and loss categories are discarded, market research is eliminated.
Attractive products start to sell.
But . . . Disney will bury Pixar! Sony or Microsoft will crush the iPod! Walmart or Amazon will dwarf iTunes! Nokia and the Blackberry will outdo the iPhone! Expensive laptops won’t compete with Dell! Apple stores can’t compete with Best Buy! Adobe flash is a must! Google Android will beat iOS!
“The petrochemical revolution gave us free energy – free mechanical energy. . .It changed the texture of society. . . this revolution, the information revolution, is a revolution of free energy as well, but of another kind: free intellectual energy. . . This revolution will dwarf the petrochemical revolution”. Jobs, 1985
Apple, Inc. is about to overtake Exxon Mobil as the largest valued corporation in the United States. And on Friday, July 29, 2011, Apple, Inc. had more cash than the United States Treasury.
How has an adopted son of a machinist, who dropped out of college after one year, who never took formal management, or economic, or engineering training, who follows few of the standard or advanced notions of modern corporate management, . . . how has he come to set the standard for leadership of large complex organizations,. . . how has he become the greatest CEO in history?
The iLeader has become the i Master.